We depicted two daughters of an older mother, unfortunately suffering from advanced dementia and locked up in a nursing home. The father had died in front of his mother, and the family had a marital trust that designated the two daughters as the remaining beneficiaries and whether they did not survive to survive the girls` problem. The income from the marital trust paid for all of the mother`s expenses. The problem was that the descendant of the trust was a third party who treated the management of the trust badly and was generally hostile to girls. We represented one of the three children of the Settlors who created a real estate trust. The trust distributed the property to the three children in equal shares after the death of the Settlors. So let`s get back to action. A document has been defined as a written document executed with the required formality, by which an interest, right or property is transferred or confirmed, or an obligation binding on a person is established or confirmed (the reference to an obligation that clearly involves a trust). So what happens if an act is not performed correctly? The answer is that it will depend on the circumstances, that is, what went wrong. A poorly executed document can be corrected in some circumstances, and in other cases it can be considered null and void. As noted above, there is no general requirement to create a trust through a document, a misfilled trust deed regarding a life insurance policy or investment will not necessarily render the trust invalid, but it may be necessary to go to court to determine the outcome.
We also took the position, albeit perhaps less convincing, that the Settlor had created oral trust. A trust financed by personal property may be based orally on “clear and convincing evidence”. (Prob. Code 15207). We have filed an application for cancellation and cancellation of the subsidy instrument that the property transfers for various reasons, including the Succession Act section 850(a)(3)(b);; unlawful influence; financial abuse of older adults; fraud; Impose constructive trust. Our petition demanded punitive damages under Cal. Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15610.30 et Cal. Probate Code Section 850.b) The Settlors` oral statement alone does not constitute sufficient evidence of the establishment of a trust on personal property. Now that the eldest mother had an ad litem guardian, it seemed that, under the laws of the amendment by her guardian, the mother could change the trust to appoint another mandatary. But in the event that there is no letter signed by the parties, what can a party consider in the application of an agreement that it deems legally binding? This element is often referred to as the “meeting of heads”. Setlorine, the surviving mother of the three children, was seriously ill and suffering from terminal cancer..
. . .